shakemenu.GIF - 5152 Bytes

 King Lear
        King Lear is a play written by William Shakespeare that 
focuses on the relationships of many characters, some good, some evil. 
 This is a great tragedy that is full of injustice at the beginning 
and the restoring of justice towards the end.  The good are misjudged 
as evil and the evil are accepted as good.  It is not until the end of 
the play that the righteous people are recognized as such.  There is 
great treachery and deceit involved in the hierarchy of English rule. 
The great mistake in this play was made by Lear when he decided to 
divide up his kingdom to his three daughters.  In order to determine 
which share each should get, he had each of his daughters give 
testimonies of love for him.  Cordelia, the youngest, refused to go 
overboard with her statement.  When asked for her testimony, she 
simply replied, "Unhappy that I am, I cannot heave my heart into my 
mouth.  I love your Majesty according to my bond, no more no 
less."(I,i, ln 91-93)  Lear becomes enraged and casts her off saying, 
"Here I disclaim all my paternal care, propinquity and property of 
blood, and as a stranger to my heart and me hold this from thee for 
ever."(I,i, ln 113-116).  Some think that Cordelia was prideful, or 
even a fool in her response, but I believe she was simply being honest 
and true. 

        Another mistake that was made in the course of the play was by 
the Earl of Gloucester.  After being tricked by his bastard son, 
Edmund, into believing that his other son, Edgar, was plotting to kill 
him, he put all his faith in Edmund, which would eventually lead to 
his demise.  Besides believing that Cordelia was being true and honest 
to her father, I think that Lear and the Earl of Gloucester were 
fools, regarding the banishments of their righteous children. 

        After reading this play, I found it hard to believe that 
Cordelia was being anything but true in her simple proclamation of 
love for her father.  I can't believe that Shakespeare was trying to
portray her as a spoiled, prideful child.  I do not believe she was 
foolish in her decision to restrain from trying to persuade him into 
giving her a larger portion of his kingdom.  I think it was apparent 
early that Cordelia was struggling with what she was going to say to 
her father.  In her asides she says, "What shall Cordelia speak? Love, 
and be silent"(I,i, ln 62), and after Regan spoke, "Then poor 
Cordelia; And yet not so, since I am sure my love's more ponderous 
than my tongue."(I,i, ln 76-78).  It is obvious that she loves her 
father, but she can't express it the way in which Lear wants her to.  
Because of this, she is disowned and sent away to France.  The King
even refers to her as, "Unfriended, new adopted to our hate, dow'red 
with our curse, and strangered with our oath."(I,i, ln 203-204).  
Cordelia's love for her father was shown further when she received the 
letters concerning Lear's mental state after being mistreated by his 
two other daughters.  It was said that, "now and then an ample tear 
trilled down her delicate cheek."(IV,iii, ln 12-13).  Cordelia then 
orders for some of the French soldiers to bring Lear to her so that 
she can look after him before the war between Britain and the French 
soldiers begins.  Her love was further displayed when she says, "But 
love, dear love, and our aged father's right.  Soon may I hear and see 
him!"(IV,iv, ln 28-29).  Because of all of this, I firmly believe that
Cordelia truly loved her father and was only being honest when she 
refused to profess her love for him in order to rule a portion of 

        Besides believing that Cordelia was true in her response, I 
also think that Lear was acting as a fool when he disowned his only 
loving daughter.  He made a monumental mistake when he handed over 
British rule to his two evil daughters, Regan and Goneril.  This is 
what eventually led to his mental breakdown and the deaths of many of 
the heads of Britain.  If he had only chose to keep control over his 
kingdom or to give up control to someone trustworthy, no one would 
have had to suffer as they did.  Some people knew he was committing a 
terrible folly, especially the Earl of Kent.  This is apparent when he 
says, "Think'st thou that duty shall have dread to speak when power to 
flattery bows?  To plainness honor's bound when majesty falls to 
folly.  Reserve thy state, and in thy best consideration check this 
hideous rashness.(I,i, ln 147-151).  Lear ignores this plea and even 
banishes Kent, who returns later, disguised as a servant.  Another
person to recognize his mistake is the fool.  In one of his rhymes, he 
says, "That lord that counselled thee to give away thy land, come 
place him here by me - Do thou for him stand.  The sweet and bitter 
fool will presently appear; the one in motley here, the other found 
out there.(I,iv, ln 133-140).  After giving all his power to Regan and 
Goneril, they reject him, kicking him out of their houses.  This 
treatment of Lear drives him mad and he wishes that he had never given 
away his power or disowned Cordelia. This can be seen when he states, 
"No, you unnatural hags!  I will have such revenges on you both that 
all the world shall-I will do such things-What they are, yet I know 
not; but they shall be the terrors of the earth.(II,iv, ln 273-277).  
It would take an entire book to explain all the ramifications of his 
great folly.  However, I can say that the deaths of Goneril, Regan, 
Cordelia, and of himself may be attributed to his mistake.  He also 
caused a war between Britain and France that should not have occurred. 
I believe it is clear that Lear acted as a fool when giving his land 
to Goneril and Regan, but not to Cordelia. 

        Another character who was very foolish in distinguishing 
between good and bad children was the Earl of Gloucester.  Edmund, a 
bastard son of Gloucester, tricked him into believing that his 
brother, Edgar wanted to kill him and take his inheritance.  He wrote 
a phony letter which implied all of this.  Gloucester became outraged 
and gave all his trust to Edmund.  He even declares, "O villain, 
villain!  His very opinion in the letter.  Abhorred villain, 
unnatural, detested, brutish villain."(I,ii, ln 74-76).  Edgar then 
convinces Edgar that he should flee because his life is in danger.  He 
also believes Edmund, so he leaves his home and ends up hiding in a 
cave.  Gloucester again takes Edmund completely into his confidence 
when he informs him that he was going to try and help Lear when he was 
out in a storm, even though he was given strict orders by Regan and 
the Duke of Cornwall.  Edgar immediately tells Cornwall of the 
information he has just learned.  He says to himself, "This courtesy 
forbid thee shall the Duke instantly know, and of that letter too.  
This seems a fair deserving, and must draw me that which my father 
loses-no less than all.  The younger rises when the old doth 
fall."(III,iii, ln 19-23).  This treachery by Edmund ultimately leads 
to Gloucester having his eyes gauged out.  Despite the efforts of 
Edgar to take care of him and restore his desire to live, Gloucester 
dies of a broken heart.  Edgar explains, "His flawed heart - Alack, 
too weak the conflict to support - twixt two extremes of passion, joy 
and grief, burst smilingly.(V,iii, ln 197-200).  Edgar ends up killing 
Edmund, which means that Gloucester's folly resulted in the deaths of 
both he and Edmund.  It is very clear that the Earl of Gloucester can 
be considered a fool for taking Edmund into his confidence. 

        Overall, this play was full of evil and treachery.  However, 
justice seemed to be served somewhat at the end.  I do believe that 
Cordelia was very good-natured and was the only "true" daughter of 
King Lear.  In a play full of evil people, she was one of the only 
honest and loving.  It is amazing that only through great hardships, 
such as Gloucester having his eyes plucked out, could he and Lear 
receive true insight. 

Back To the Top ] [ Back To Essay Page ]
Complete Works Cliff Notes Free Papers! Biography Shakespeare Links Shakespeare discussion